On 28 Jan 2014, at 23:34, Norbert Hartl <norb...@hartl.name> wrote: > > Am 28.01.2014 um 22:50 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com>: > >> they do not appear because they shouldn’t :) >> >> MCPackage = RPackage in 3.0 >> > Ah, very good. I see this of course shortly after I applied ones again stupid > package names to be able to separate tests. > >> that means that you need 3 mc packages… or 1 r packages + 2 tags >> > tags? What year is it? At the moment I’m feeling as I had been off the list > for quite a while! Ok, I’ll try to find these myself. > > Btw. 30 minutes ago I found metacello stuff (create baseline, create > development version) in the menu of the monticello packages. Great stuff! Are > you sure there isn’t a lot of good stuff sneaking in without anyone noticing? > >> btw… there are still some glitches with that that need to be fixed. Please >> report if/when you find them :) >> > Oh my, I hate it because that is the one thing I’m good at….finding bugs.
cool… we need more like you (and so far Stef has the podium) :) > > Norbert > >> Esteban >> >> On 28 Jan 2014, at 22:29, Norbert Hartl <norb...@hartl.name> wrote: >> >>> I have a project that defines a package >>> >>> Project-Core >>> >>> then I added some more like >>> >>> Project-Core-Exception >>> Project-Core-Command >>> … >>> >>> but those do not appear in the monticello package. Is it supposed to be >>> that way from 3.0 on or is this a bug? >>> >>> Norbert >>> >>> >> >> > >
