Am 28.01.2014 um 23:47 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]>:

> 
> On 28 Jan 2014, at 23:34, Norbert Hartl <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Am 28.01.2014 um 22:50 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]>:
>> 
>>> they do not appear because they shouldn’t :)
>>> 
>>> MCPackage = RPackage in 3.0
>>> 
>> Ah, very good. I see this of course shortly after I applied ones again 
>> stupid package names to be able to separate tests.
>> 
>>> that means that you need 3 mc packages… or 1 r packages + 2 tags
>>> 
>> tags? What year is it? At the moment I’m feeling as I had been off the list 
>> for quite a while! Ok, I’ll try to find these myself. 
>> 
>> Btw. 30 minutes ago I found metacello stuff (create baseline, create 
>> development version) in the menu of the monticello packages. Great stuff! 
>> Are you sure there isn’t a lot of good stuff sneaking in without anyone 
>> noticing?
>> 
>>> btw… there are still some glitches with that that need to be fixed. Please 
>>> report if/when you find them :)
>>> 
>> Oh my, I hate it because that is the one thing I’m good at….finding bugs.
> 
> cool… we need more like you (and so far Stef has the podium) :)
> 
Is there anything to take care in a mixed environment. I have 2.0/3.0 mixed 
setting here. From now on I like to develop in 3.0 even if the code is loaded 
into a 2.0 image. Can I expect trouble when loading the finer grained packages 
produced via 3.0 in a 2.0 image?

Norbert

>> 
>> Norbert
>> 
>>> Esteban
>>> 
>>> On 28 Jan 2014, at 22:29, Norbert Hartl <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I have a project that defines a package
>>>> 
>>>> Project-Core
>>>> 
>>>> then I added some more like
>>>> 
>>>> Project-Core-Exception
>>>> Project-Core-Command
>>>> …
>>>> 
>>>> but those do not appear in the monticello package. Is it supposed to be 
>>>> that way from 3.0 on or is this a bug?
>>>> 
>>>> Norbert

Reply via email to