Am 29.01.2014 um 15:28 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]>:
> > On 29 Jan 2014, at 11:25, Norbert Hartl <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Am 28.01.2014 um 23:47 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]>: >> >>> >>> On 28 Jan 2014, at 23:34, Norbert Hartl <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Am 28.01.2014 um 22:50 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>>> they do not appear because they shouldn’t :) >>>>> >>>>> MCPackage = RPackage in 3.0 >>>>> >>>> Ah, very good. I see this of course shortly after I applied ones again >>>> stupid package names to be able to separate tests. >>>> >>>>> that means that you need 3 mc packages… or 1 r packages + 2 tags >>>>> >>>> tags? What year is it? At the moment I’m feeling as I had been off the >>>> list for quite a while! Ok, I’ll try to find these myself. >>>> >>>> Btw. 30 minutes ago I found metacello stuff (create baseline, create >>>> development version) in the menu of the monticello packages. Great stuff! >>>> Are you sure there isn’t a lot of good stuff sneaking in without anyone >>>> noticing? >>>> >>>>> btw… there are still some glitches with that that need to be fixed. >>>>> Please report if/when you find them :) >>>>> >>>> Oh my, I hate it because that is the one thing I’m good at….finding bugs. >>> >>> cool… we need more like you (and so far Stef has the podium) :) >>> >> Is there anything to take care in a mixed environment. I have 2.0/3.0 mixed >> setting here. From now on I like to develop in 3.0 even if the code is >> loaded into a 2.0 image. Can I expect trouble when loading the finer grained >> packages produced via 3.0 in a 2.0 image? > > it should work without problem… but of course if you attempt to save in 2.0 > package A will include A-B and A-C :) > Yep, and I will have dirty packages in my image. Thanks for the hint but I can live with that. The next time I think I could do a dirty hotfix on the server and save it I will be in trouble :) Norbert > Esteban > >> >> Norbert >> >>>> >>>> Norbert >>>> >>>>> Esteban >>>>> >>>>> On 28 Jan 2014, at 22:29, Norbert Hartl <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I have a project that defines a package >>>>>> >>>>>> Project-Core >>>>>> >>>>>> then I added some more like >>>>>> >>>>>> Project-Core-Exception >>>>>> Project-Core-Command >>>>>> … >>>>>> >>>>>> but those do not appear in the monticello package. Is it supposed to be >>>>>> that way from 3.0 on or is this a bug? >>>>>> >>>>>> Norbert
