2014-06-11 16:55 GMT-03:00 Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]>: > > On 11 Jun 2014, at 16:39, kilon alios <[email protected]> wrote: >> excellent news. I really believe in Morphic and I really like its general >> design. If you we can clean the mud I am sure we will discover quite a >> diamond underneath. Thanks.
> which general design? the pattern in which is based? that’s not enough to > keep it :) What pattern is it? > Sorry but there is no easy/efficient way to clean it. > The only way to clean Morphic is to reimplement it. I wouldn't do that, and instead replace it by something different and use Morphs just for views. > Clean it is just too much work… and too many design decisions where made > that time and patches made them obsolete or not correct. > Not to talk about the mix of concepts (bah, the no existence of separation > between them). Exactly, there is nothing close to a MVC/MVP/MVVM pattern in it. Right? > Block is not a clean. Is a revamp. > > No offence intended to Morphic: no matter how good was at the beginning, > *every* system evolves up to a point the effort required to maintain it is > superior to the effort required to reimplement it (with all the experience > as a superior step). > (yeah, yeah… a lot of people will disagree. But time has proven me right… > and will continue doing it :P) I agree with you here. Regards! Esteban A. Maringolo
