On 28 Jul 2014, at 11:36, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 28 Jul 2014, at 11:15, Henrik Johansen <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> On 21 Jul 2014, at 3:34 , Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> On 21 Jul 2014, at 09:44, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On 21/7/14 08:46, Torsten Bergmann wrote: >>>>> DALI >>>>> http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/DALi.html >>>>> >>>>> VOYAGE >>>>> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~estebanlm/Voyage >>>> >>>> I do not know if there are back ends for something else than mongo in >>>> Voyage. >>> >>> certainly not for GOODS :) >>> actually we have just “in memory” and “mongo” (in memory works fine when >>> deploying on gemstone, for example) >>> I always want to add more backends but well… time, time, time… >>> >>> Esteban >> >> I’m intending to add one for Riak, in an unspecified amount of time, >> depending on my other workload… >> I’d like it performant, and use a client up to date with the latest Riak >> API, which (afaict) means using the ProtoBuffer protocol, which means having >> to implementing PB first. It would be good to have a ProtoBuffers implementation that is separate. The same goes for the BSON implementation hidden in StHub. >> The progress so far is I got the PB serializer almost done (sidetracked by >> wanting an NB-based UTF8 converter to make it more performant), but I >> haven’t started the PB message parser yet, nor the actual Riak backend. > > I was intending to add Riak support too :) > Do you want access to the repo, so we keep all together? (and then I can > check and maybe collaborate) > and btw, are you using/checking Phriak? > > Esteban > >> >> Cheers, >> Henry
