On 28 Jul 2014, at 11:41 , Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 28 Jul 2014, at 11:36, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On 28 Jul 2014, at 11:15, Henrik Johansen <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> On 21 Jul 2014, at 3:34 , Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On 21 Jul 2014, at 09:44, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 21/7/14 08:46, Torsten Bergmann wrote: >>>>>> DALI >>>>>> http://ss3.gemstone.com/ss/DALi.html >>>>>> >>>>>> VOYAGE >>>>>> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~estebanlm/Voyage >>>>> >>>>> I do not know if there are back ends for something else than mongo in >>>>> Voyage. >>>> >>>> certainly not for GOODS :) >>>> actually we have just “in memory” and “mongo” (in memory works fine when >>>> deploying on gemstone, for example) >>>> I always want to add more backends but well… time, time, time… >>>> >>>> Esteban >>> >>> I’m intending to add one for Riak, in an unspecified amount of time, >>> depending on my other workload… >>> I’d like it performant, and use a client up to date with the latest Riak >>> API, which (afaict) means using the ProtoBuffer protocol, which means >>> having to implementing PB first. > > It would be good to have a ProtoBuffers implementation that is separate. I agree, keeping the building blocks separate is nice :) Cheers. Henry
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
