I think the future are tools tailor made for specific kind of tasks . The
age of IDEs and Languages has come to an end. Neither programming languages
and IDEs can maintain the complexity of modern software. They are too
generic.I think that what we need is a UNIX system but with GUIs , a
collection of tools that can talk to each other but at the same time have
an extremely limited scope as tools. Smalltalk definitely moves towards
that direction but even Smalltalk is far from that goal.

I see that paradigm a lot in 3d art, it raises the amount of knowledge
required  because you end up with learning hundreds of tools contained in a
single application but if you want professional results and you are dead
serious about efficiency and productivity then its the way to go.

I will install DFlow and help you in your saga, but bare in mind that DFlow
will tell you what I use and I how , but it wont answer you the most
important question "what I want to use and how I want to use it" .


On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Roberto Minelli <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> I uploaded a web page to explain Self-Adaptive IDEs, the vision I will
> develop for my Ph.D
> http://www.inf.usi.ch/phd/minelli/self-adaptive-ides/index.html.
>
> Please take a minute to look at it and tell me your opinion!
>
> At the moment we are conducting an experiment with my interaction profiler
> (DFlow). It would be
> great if you could participate! This will cost you little effort but help
> me to gather an understanding
> of development practices and interactions. This is the ground for
> improving our Pharo IDE!
>
> Cheers and thanks in advance,
> Roberto
>
>
>

Reply via email to