Torsten Bergmann wrote > I personally would keep ValueHolder as it is a well known concept
Although it's extremely corollary to the purpose of this thread, since it keeps coming up, I just want to remind that the point of the original ValueHolder-rename discussion (in which no one said "let's keep ValueHolder") was that a quick google search seemed to show that "Value Holder" does NOT mean what we're using it to mean. ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Quitting-the-community-tp4773730p4773842.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
