On 03 Oct 2014, at 12:46, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 03 Oct 2014, at 12:21, [email protected] wrote: > >> Frankly, I see fogbugz issues closed with some ignore/cannot reproduce >> status, so, I am not creating any of them anymore. Why bother, except for >> blocking bugs? >> > Tell me: What is the difference between a bug that it fixed and one that can > not be reproduced? I wonder if people have an idea of the scale of things… - We closed 107 issues the last 7 days - there are 618 open issues - There where 11268 issues reported for Pharo since we started. So when I look at an issue i try to reproduce it. If I can not, I close it. Else this is not possible to do, sorry. Even if I wanted to: If we keep all non-reproducible cases open we soon will be paralysed. (And that by issues that to 99% are fixed). Marcus
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
