Ok, I'll update the configurations.

Thanks,

Thierry

2014-10-09 23:15 GMT+02:00 David T. Lewis <le...@mail.msen.com>:

> Darn, I think we must have both done our updates on the same day. The last
> update I did was this (time stamp is GMT -4 hours) :
>
> CommandShell-dtl.76 Dave Lewis, 5 October 2014 5:29:32 pm
> CommandShell 4.6.9
>
> Improve pipe closing for PipeableOSProcess class>>command: and related
> methods to support use as stand alone command processor. An expression
> such as the following will now close all open handles when command
> processing is complete:
>
>   "(PipeableOSProcess command: '/bin/echo this is a test') output"
>
> If you could update the configuration to pick this up, that would be
> great. I think it will be helpful for people who want to easily execute
> commands directly from the image.
>
> I think the two sub-packages that you would update are
> CommandShell-Base-dtl.38 and CommandShell-Piping-dtl.16
>
> Thanks,
> Dave
>
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> > thanks to you. I updated OSProcess to 4.5.11 and CommandShell to 4.6.8;
> > are those the latest? I did it last Sunday.
> >
> > Thierry
> >
> > Le 09/10/2014 22:42, David T. Lewis a écrit :
> >> Thierry,
> >>
> >> Thanks for doing those configuration updates, I hit "send" before I saw
> >> your reply.
> >>
> >> Dave
> >>
> >>> Hi Noury,
> >>>
> >>> no, OSProcess on Squeaksource is not dead and is integrating all the
> >>> changes needed for all the platforms it is running on.
> >>>
> >>> And as you can see, I very recently updated the configuration to make
> >>> sure it was pointing to the very latest version.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>> Thierry
> >>>
> >>> Le 09/10/2014 22:30, Noury Bouraqadi a écrit :
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> Just tried to install the stable version of OSProcess using the
> >>>> configuration browser on a 3.0.
> >>>> I noticed it is still on http://www.squeaksource.com/OSProcess.
> >>>> Does it mean it is dead? if yes, what is the alternative?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Thanx
> >>>> Noury
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to