> On 24 Nov 2014, at 23:48, [email protected] wrote: > > On mobile, large apps are not staying installed for long as they are all > competing for the always too small space. > > If say Twitter will do with is huge size, other apps will be compared to it. > Which means that a 30 mégas app us a monster asking for removal. > the average size of any app in iPhone is around 25m (or it was in 2012, nowadays should be more), so I hardly believe that :)
Esteban > I rooted my phone to be able to remove vendor apps in order to get some more > space. > > Phil > > Le 24 nov. 2014 22:31, "kilon alios" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit : > I have an OS (Yosemite) thats takes 5 out my 8 GB of Ram. Google Chrome with > opened 20 tabs that consumes around 1 GB of Ram. Games that eat Ram like > peanuts and I do 3d graphics with blender which also can consume GBs like no > tommorow. Music productions was not much diffirent either. I watch movies > which are several GBs each. I have 1 TB drive its already half full (mainly > because of movies). > > 32 mb is nothing. XCode with an empty project cosumes 130 MB. Dont forget > that it loads no libraries like Pharo and definetly is no live coding > enviroment. > > Pharo consumes around 80MBs > > Emacs with zero guis still consumes 40mbs. > > Small is not beautiful its irrelevant. > > Unless you are on a platform that has real problem with sizes. > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Hilaire <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Pharo 1.4 image = 15MB > Pharo 3 image = 22MB > Pharo4 image = 32MB > > Don't know about Pharo 2.0 as, skip it. > > Is there a limit? > > Hopefully I gave up on the idea of tablet use but aren't we loosing the > sight on small is beautiful? > > Hilaire > > -- > Dr. Geo - http://drgeo.eu <http://drgeo.eu/> > iStoa - http://istoa.drgeo.eu <http://istoa.drgeo.eu/> > > >
