Thank you very much. So please explain how the PR message is not aligned with the technical vision. I don't see any inconsistency.
Ben Coman wrote > On Wednesday, December 31, 2014, Ben Coman wrote: > >> >> >> On Wednesday, December 31, 2014, horrido < > horrido.hobbies@ > > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',' > horrido.hobbies@ > ');>> wrote: >> >>> And, yes, I did not do my most thorough homework regarding Pharo, as >>> several >>> of you have pointed out. Frankly, I don't have /that/ much time and >>> energy. >>> I'm old and retired. I'm just doing this for pleasure. >>> >>> So I rely on /you/ to set me straight. >> >> >> In process :) >> >> >>> I remind you that I'm just the >>> coordinator of the campaign, because I'm sure none of you have that much >>> time to do what I'm doing. >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>> Marcus suggested that anyone can create a Google+ page, but he misses >>> the >>> point. The Google+ page is just one brick in the foundation of the >>> campaign. >>> It's part of a whole. >>> >>> Norbert suggests that I think I know what to do. No, I have ideas and I >>> have >>> a plan. There's no guarantee that it will work. Either you buy into my >>> plan, >>> or you don't. Either I have your support, or I don't. If the latter, I >>> shan't waste any more time (yours or mind). >>> >>> >> >> It's not just a matter of time, but inclination. If you are inclined to >>> do this, then it should be supported - but it's a matter of getting the >>> PR message aligned with the technical vision. We don't want the market >>> being told one thing then getting a different message here in-list. So >>> you made a misstep here. That's okay, you learn more that way than doing >>> nothing. It may take some more back-n-forth. I hope you continue. >> >> >> -Ben >> >> -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/The-Smalltalk-Renaissance-Program-tp4797112p4797416.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
