On Thursday, January 1, 2015, Ben Coman wrote:
> I refer to the two paragraphs following "On pharo being a new language". > I think Sven's response addressed these the best. > > Now I wonder if a history of evolving features from Smalltalk-72 "in the > context of Pharo" being another step of evolution would be a useful > addition to the Pharo story. > > Cheers -Ben > > On Wednesday, December 31, 2014, horrido <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> Thank you very much. So please explain how the PR message is not aligned >> with >> the technical vision. I don't see any inconsistency. >> >> >> >> Ben Coman wrote >> > On Wednesday, December 31, 2014, Ben Coman wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, December 31, 2014, horrido < >> >> > horrido.hobbies@ >> >> > > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',' >> >> > horrido.hobbies@ >> >> > ');>> wrote: >> >> >> >>> And, yes, I did not do my most thorough homework regarding Pharo, as >> >>> several >> >>> of you have pointed out. Frankly, I don't have /that/ much time and >> >>> energy. >> >>> I'm old and retired. I'm just doing this for pleasure. >> >>> >> >>> So I rely on /you/ to set me straight. >> >> >> >> >> >> In process :) >> >> >> >> >> >>> I remind you that I'm just the >> >>> coordinator of the campaign, because I'm sure none of you have that >> much >> >>> time to do what I'm doing. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >>> Marcus suggested that anyone can create a Google+ page, but he misses >> >>> the >> >>> point. The Google+ page is just one brick in the foundation of the >> >>> campaign. >> >>> It's part of a whole. >> >>> >> >>> Norbert suggests that I think I know what to do. No, I have ideas and >> I >> >>> have >> >>> a plan. There's no guarantee that it will work. Either you buy into my >> >>> plan, >> >>> or you don't. Either I have your support, or I don't. If the latter, I >> >>> shan't waste any more time (yours or mind). >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> It's not just a matter of time, but inclination. If you are inclined >> to >> >>> do this, then it should be supported - but it's a matter of getting >> the >> >>> PR message aligned with the technical vision. We don't want the >> market >> >>> being told one thing then getting a different message here in-list. >> So >> >>> you made a misstep here. That's okay, you learn more that way than >> doing >> >>> nothing. It may take some more back-n-forth. I hope you continue. >> >> >> >> >> >> -Ben >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://forum.world.st/The-Smalltalk-Renaissance-Program-tp4797112p4797416.html >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at >> Nabble.com. >> >>
