I tried your shortcuts for selecting a package, it highlights it but does not select it in Pharo 5.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 3:37 PM Thierry Goubier <[email protected]> wrote: > 2015-08-17 14:34 GMT+02:00 Dimitris Chloupis <[email protected]>: > >> yeap AltBrowser indeed does it, nice , time to give it another try:) >> > > The thing I haven't done yet is turn a category of packages in a RB > environment, to scope all commands and searches to that. Ah well, there is > allways something to do ;) > > Thierry > > >> >> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:36 AM Thierry Goubier < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Le 16/08/2015 22:48, Dimitris Chloupis a écrit : >>> > One of the things that annoy me is how many Configurations and >>> Baselines >>> > pollute the package space that are of little interest to the user. It >>> > would be nice to group them and filter them out of Nautilus unless user >>> > asks for them. >>> >>> This is what AltBrowser does. All configurations are in a category named >>> 'Configurations' and all Baselines are in a category named 'Baselines'. >>> Unless you really search for it, you won't see it. >>> >>> > I really like this new approach great work. >>> >>> It certainly help. >>> >>> I have played a bit with extracting info from Configurations to classify >>> automagically, but it doesn't work very well. >>> >>> Thierry >>> >>> > On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 7:34 PM stepharo <[email protected] >>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Le 16/8/15 17:00, Sean P. DeNigris a écrit : >>> > > stepharo wrote >>> > >> you get a project (group) with all your packages together ready >>> > to work ;) >>> > > Cool! I feel more and more that the standard "Package" pane is >>> > only useful >>> > > for... packaging, and when one takes off the dependency >>> > management hat and >>> > > puts the user hat on (i.e. most of the time), what you really >>> > want there is >>> > > a logical view of the system. So I see three use cases: >>> > > - Logical view of the system - I guess this was the original >>> > intention of >>> > > Categories, but has been hijacked by Monticello >>> > > - By project - which, as you just showed, we have now, yay! >>> > > - By package - the least useful, but primary (up til now), view >>> > >>> > Indeed. >>> > We will see what we get at the end but may be something like >>> > >>> > MyProject >>> > AnotherProject >>> > System >>> > LowLevel >>> > >>> > And people will not be overwhelmed by hundreds of nice packages. :) >>> > >>> > I think that touching package contents under the assumption that >>> the >>> > package list is too long in the UI >>> > is the wrong way to look at the problem. >>> > Packages are unit of deployment and we need Projects - unit >>> of >>> > knowledge. And the UI should shows both >>> > depending on the view we want to get. >>> > >>> > Stef >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > ----- >>> > > Cheers, >>> > > Sean >>> > > -- >>> > > View this message in context: >>> > >>> http://forum.world.st/Projects-are-slowly-getting-to-live-and-tp4843277p4843286.html >>> > > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at >>> > Nabble.com. >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>>
