> On 08 Sep 2015, at 10:13 , Stephan Eggermont <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 06-09-15 10:37, stepharo wrote: >> >> >> Le 5/9/15 22:42, Tudor Girba a écrit : >>> +1. >>> >>> We already deprecated on:send:to:/on:do: and I think we should do the >>> same for the subscribe:send:to:. >> Thanks Doru. I thought the same. Because each time I read subscribe: my >> mind stops for about half or a second until I remember that this is >> the same as when: send: to: > > When looking at the implementation, it looks as if we should > replace all #when:send:to: by #subscribe:when:do:, not the other way > around. > > Where is this all coming from? > > Stephan > > >
An attempt at compatibility. IIRC; the original VW Announcements use when:send:to: (polymorphic with the old event system), while Lukas' implementation from Seaside use(d/s) subscribe:when:do: My 2c; If you need to pick one over the other, choose when:send:to. Cheers, Henry
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
