Note that when:send:to: already existed in VW before announcements (it did work with a symbol like when: #someAspectChanged send: #someAction to: self, and this was tiggered thru dependents mechanism - self changed: #someAspectChanged...).
IMO, it is very expressive, whatever the underlying mechanism (dependents or Announcement). 2015-09-09 8:49 GMT+02:00 Norbert Hartl <[email protected]>: > > > > > > Am 08.09.2015 um 22:49 schrieb stepharo <[email protected]>: > > > > Me too :) > > I do not care that they is a registration mechanism behind. > > > But you get a subscription back. Und the user should be aware of that > there is no magical unsubscribe mechanism. So this no reason for me but I > still like when:send:to: better although it feels a bit awkward. > > Norbert > > Stef > > > > Le 8/9/15 16:30, Ferlicot D. Cyril a écrit : > >> Le 08/09/2015 10:13, Stephan Eggermont a écrit : > >> > >>> When looking at the implementation, it looks as if we should > >>> replace all #when:send:to: by #subscribe:when:do:, not the other way > >>> around. > >>> > >>> Where is this all coming from? > >>> > >>> Stephan > >> I think that #when:send:to: is more explicit and more understandable, > >> but this is a personal opinion. > > > > > >
