Re: [Pharo-dev] when:send:to: vs. subscribe:send:to:

[stepharo]

Le 9/9/15 11:21, Nicolas Cellier a écrit :

Note that when:send:to: already existed in VW before announcements (it did work with a symbol like when: #someAspectChanged send: #someAction to: self, and this was tiggered thru dependents mechanism - self changed: #someAspectChanged...).

yes

IMO, it is very expressive, whatever the underlying mechanism (dependents or Announcement).

+ 1

2015-09-09 8:49 GMT+02:00 Norbert Hartl <norb...@hartl.name <mailto:norb...@hartl.name>>:

    > Am 08.09.2015 um 22:49 schrieb stepharo <steph...@free.fr
    <mailto:steph...@free.fr>>:
    >
    > Me too :)
    > I do not care that they is a registration mechanism behind.
    >
    But you get a subscription back. Und the user should be aware of
    that there is no magical unsubscribe mechanism. So this no reason
    for me but I still like when:send:to: better although it feels a
    bit awkward.

    Norbert
    > Stef
    >
    > Le 8/9/15 16:30, Ferlicot D. Cyril a écrit :
    >> Le 08/09/2015 10:13, Stephan Eggermont a écrit :
    >>
    >>> When looking at the implementation, it looks as if we should
    >>> replace all #when:send:to: by #subscribe:when:do:, not the
    other way
    >>> around.
    >>>
    >>> Where is this all coming from?
    >>>
    >>> Stephan
    >> I think that #when:send:to: is more explicit and more
    understandable,
    >> but this is a personal opinion.
    >
    >