Le 22 sept. 2015 à 07:49, [email protected] a écrit : > > Le 22 sept. 2015 07:40, "Sven Van Caekenberghe" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > > > > > On 21 Sep 2015, at 23:53, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I think that having metadata (style) language and data (source code) > > > mixed together is a bad idea. > > > I never like the ]lang[ tag because it is a huge hack. It does not even > > > exist in the Smalltalk syntax!!! > > > We save code that the parser cannot parse. What we fun idea. > > > So people are bashing for backward compatibility and we remove a bad way > > > to encode > > > metadata then suddenly it looks like we were doing something bad. > > > > > > Stef > > > > I am with Stef, it is a silly idea to mix the two. Nobody uses this in > > Pharo. Cleaning up means simplifying too. > > In the code no. But in the comments, that would be good to have back. In > color form. As we can write pillar class comments, can't we render them ? > Moose as an editor/viewer for pillar files > >
Yes, it is where we want to go: use Pillar for styled comments. Once we have that, we can remove Text styling from source code / comments.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
