I guess that Alexandre want to say git and not github. What is important is to have git support on Pharo in the future so we can switch from github to bitbucket or any git hosting solution.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 5:30 PM, monty <[email protected]> wrote: > Github is a private VC funded company that we don't own that tomorrow could > go away or adopt policies harmful to us. If Ruby can have rubygems.org (and > if Steph can continue to get funding from INRIA/ESUG), then why can't we have > something like STHub that's ours? > > Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 at 11:19 AM > From: "Alexandre Bergel" <[email protected]> > To: "Pharo Development List" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Pharo-dev] Smalltalkhub projects not indexed? > > On Oct 22, 2015, at 12:09 PM, monty <[email protected]> wrote: > SmalltalkHub looks great but lacks the features of SqueakSource3. It would be > great if we could switch the backend to SS3 while keeping the look of STHub. > Having a reliable solution on GitHub will be even better in my opinion. > Moreover, it will reveal that Pharo is within the top 20-languages. > > Alexandre > -- Serge Stinckwich UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/
