In the 80s? you probably mean SCCS... 2015-10-22 18:01 GMT+02:00 Esteban A. Maringolo <[email protected]>:
> 2015-10-22 12:57 GMT-03:00 Andreas Wacknitz <[email protected]>: > > Am 22.10.15 um 17:30 schrieb monty: > >> > >> Github is a private VC funded company that we don't own that tomorrow > >> could go away or adopt policies harmful to us. If Ruby can have > rubygems.org > >> (and if Steph can continue to get funding from INRIA/ESUG), then why > can't > >> we have something like STHub that's ours? > >> > >> > > +1 > > Github may be hip today but can be outdated in a few years. If Smalltalk > > would have chosen a version management technology > > that was en vogue in the 80s where would it be now? Does anybody even > > remember one of those from then? > > Having nice github integration (or whatever might be the technology of > the > > day) is one thing, completely relying on it is something > > different. > > We would be using SourceForge, probably :). > Some projects still use it. Which ones? Well... the ones using > Subversion, mostly old projects (although still maintained). > > But I couldn't find a new project choosing it over GitHub for code > management. > > > Esteban A. Maringolo > >
