+1
> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 at 11:46 AM
> From: "Serge Stinckwich" <[email protected]>
> To: "Pharo Development List" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Pharo-dev] Smalltalkhub projects not indexed?
>
> I guess that Alexandre want to say git and not github.
>
> What is important is to have git support on Pharo in the future so we
> can switch from github to bitbucket or any git hosting solution.
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 5:30 PM, monty <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Github is a private VC funded company that we don't own that tomorrow could
> > go away or adopt policies harmful to us. If Ruby can have rubygems.org (and
> > if Steph can continue to get funding from INRIA/ESUG), then why can't we
> > have something like STHub that's ours?
> >
> > Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 at 11:19 AM
> > From: "Alexandre Bergel" <[email protected]>
> > To: "Pharo Development List" <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: [Pharo-dev] Smalltalkhub projects not indexed?
> >
> > On Oct 22, 2015, at 12:09 PM, monty <[email protected]> wrote:
> > SmalltalkHub looks great but lacks the features of SqueakSource3. It would
> > be great if we could switch the backend to SS3 while keeping the look of
> > STHub.
> > Having a reliable solution on GitHub will be even better in my opinion.
> > Moreover, it will reveal that Pharo is within the top 20-languages.
> >
> > Alexandre
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Serge Stinckwich
> UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
> Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
> http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/
>
>
