I like these last. Particularly because
- it cleans the collection’s API - we can continue extending this idea to add parallelism, mutual exclusion... > On 29 dic 2015, at 11:53 p.m., Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Henrik, > >> On 25 Dec 2015, at 14:08, Henrik Nergaard <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Like this? >> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Latsabben/NumIt > > That is a cool take on a possible approach. Thanks for doing it, it makes it > much easier to think about and discuss alternatives. > > This inspired me to do something similar, but not quite. I am just thinking > out loud by implementation. Here is my result: > > <Collections-Operations-SvenVanCaekenberghe.1.mcz> > > There are some examples in the class comments. > > Sven > >> Best regards, >> Henrik >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Pharo-dev [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >> stepharo >> Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 9:58 AM >> To: Pharo Development List <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [Pharo-dev] #sum:, #detectSum:, #sumNumbers: >> >> Just a remark. >> I think that we discarded the proposition of having >> >> aCol arithmetic sum >> >> but I found it nice because there if was clear that you want to get back >> 0 for #(). >> >> Stef >> >
