Thank you, Sven! I like this very much.
This would also mean that we could deprecate Collection>>#sum altogether :)) Cheers, Doru > On Dec 30, 2015, at 12:53 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote: > > Hi Henrik, > >> On 25 Dec 2015, at 14:08, Henrik Nergaard <henri...@student.uia.no> wrote: >> >> Like this? >> http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Latsabben/NumIt > > That is a cool take on a possible approach. Thanks for doing it, it makes it > much easier to think about and discuss alternatives. > > This inspired me to do something similar, but not quite. I am just thinking > out loud by implementation. Here is my result: > > <Collections-Operations-SvenVanCaekenberghe.1.mcz> > > There are some examples in the class comments. > > Sven > >> Best regards, >> Henrik >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Pharo-dev [mailto:pharo-dev-boun...@lists.pharo.org] On Behalf Of >> stepharo >> Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 9:58 AM >> To: Pharo Development List <pharo-dev@lists.pharo.org> >> Subject: Re: [Pharo-dev] #sum:, #detectSum:, #sumNumbers: >> >> Just a remark. >> I think that we discarded the proposition of having >> >> aCol arithmetic sum >> >> but I found it nice because there if was clear that you want to get back >> 0 for #(). >> >> Stef >> > -- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com "Innovation comes in the least expected form. That is, if it is expected, it already happened."
