> On 05 Jan 2016, at 17:06, Stephan Eggermont <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 05-01-16 16:56, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: >> >>> On 05 Jan 2016, at 16:51, Stephan Eggermont <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On 05-01-16 16:21, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: >>>> So… I took a couple of minutes to do a small list of project description >>>> status: >>>> >>>> From a total of 379 projects currently in the catalog, just 115 have a >>>> description and/or keywords associated. >>>> Which means 264 are mysterious projects nobody can guess what are they >>>> about. >>>> >>>> I was thinking most of this projects would be in Unsorted (or Pharo 3), >>>> but I found that many are also on Pharo 5 and 4…. which is frankly >>>> unacceptable :) >>>> Even very important projects like Seaside or Garage and Glorp are not >>>> documented. >>>> >>>> So, please people… take a look at your projects and PLEASE, provide a >>>> description and proper keywords… Nobody can guess what is Aconcagua >>>> (besides a cool mountain in south america), or Telescope, etc., etc., etc. >>>> >>>> Here the list of non-documented projects: >>> >>> ss3 has no projects? >> >> catalog just catalogs projects in the MetaRepos >> you project can live where he wants, but configuration needs to be copied >> into MetaRepoForPharoXX >> >> that’s how always was, and that’s what catalog shows :) > > http://ss3.gemtalksystems.com/ss/MetaRepoForPharo20 > <http://ss3.gemtalksystems.com/ss/MetaRepoForPharo20>
hmmm… didn’t remember that existed :) but i was even considering propose you to deprecate the unsorted repository (a lot of obsolete projects there)… Esteban > > Stephan
