> On 05 Jan 2016, at 17:55, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On 05 Jan 2016, at 17:35, [email protected] wrote: >> >> I happen to know quite a number of projects. >> >> So, what's the best path to follow to put a description in them? >> >> Editing configs and saving to MetaRepo is not an issue but will put my name >> all over upon save, which is not really nice to people making the work. > > it doesn’t matter… your name will be just the config version, not the rest.
But they most probably will get overwritten in the future. The original 'source' configs need to be changed. >> >> I can spend a couple hours on it this week. > > +1 > >> >> Please advise. >> >> Phil >> >> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> On 05 Jan 2016, at 17:06, Stephan Eggermont <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On 05-01-16 16:56, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 05 Jan 2016, at 16:51, Stephan Eggermont <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 05-01-16 16:21, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: >>>>>> So… I took a couple of minutes to do a small list of project description >>>>>> status: >>>>>> >>>>>> From a total of 379 projects currently in the catalog, just 115 have a >>>>>> description and/or keywords associated. >>>>>> Which means 264 are mysterious projects nobody can guess what are they >>>>>> about. >>>>>> >>>>>> I was thinking most of this projects would be in Unsorted (or Pharo 3), >>>>>> but I found that many are also on Pharo 5 and 4…. which is frankly >>>>>> unacceptable :) >>>>>> Even very important projects like Seaside or Garage and Glorp are not >>>>>> documented. >>>>>> >>>>>> So, please people… take a look at your projects and PLEASE, provide a >>>>>> description and proper keywords… Nobody can guess what is Aconcagua >>>>>> (besides a cool mountain in south america), or Telescope, etc., etc., >>>>>> etc. >>>>>> >>>>>> Here the list of non-documented projects: >>>>> >>>>> ss3 has no projects? >>>> >>>> catalog just catalogs projects in the MetaRepos >>>> you project can live where he wants, but configuration needs to be copied >>>> into MetaRepoForPharoXX >>>> >>>> that’s how always was, and that’s what catalog shows :) >>> >>> http://ss3.gemtalksystems.com/ss/MetaRepoForPharo20 >> >> hmmm… didn’t remember that existed :) >> but i was even considering propose you to deprecate the unsorted repository >> (a lot of obsolete projects there)… >> >> Esteban >> >>> >>> Stephan >> >> >
