> On 05 Jan 2016, at 17:35, [email protected] wrote: > > I happen to know quite a number of projects. > > So, what's the best path to follow to put a description in them? > > Editing configs and saving to MetaRepo is not an issue but will put my name > all over upon save, which is not really nice to people making the work.
it doesn’t matter… your name will be just the config version, not the rest. > > I can spend a couple hours on it this week. +1 > > Please advise. > > Phil > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> On 05 Jan 2016, at 17:06, Stephan Eggermont <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> On 05-01-16 16:56, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: >>> >>>> On 05 Jan 2016, at 16:51, Stephan Eggermont <[email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 05-01-16 16:21, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: >>>>> So… I took a couple of minutes to do a small list of project description >>>>> status: >>>>> >>>>> From a total of 379 projects currently in the catalog, just 115 have a >>>>> description and/or keywords associated. >>>>> Which means 264 are mysterious projects nobody can guess what are they >>>>> about. >>>>> >>>>> I was thinking most of this projects would be in Unsorted (or Pharo 3), >>>>> but I found that many are also on Pharo 5 and 4…. which is frankly >>>>> unacceptable :) >>>>> Even very important projects like Seaside or Garage and Glorp are not >>>>> documented. >>>>> >>>>> So, please people… take a look at your projects and PLEASE, provide a >>>>> description and proper keywords… Nobody can guess what is Aconcagua >>>>> (besides a cool mountain in south america), or Telescope, etc., etc., etc. >>>>> >>>>> Here the list of non-documented projects: >>>> >>>> ss3 has no projects? >>> >>> catalog just catalogs projects in the MetaRepos >>> you project can live where he wants, but configuration needs to be copied >>> into MetaRepoForPharoXX >>> >>> that’s how always was, and that’s what catalog shows :) >> >> http://ss3.gemtalksystems.com/ss/MetaRepoForPharo20 >> <http://ss3.gemtalksystems.com/ss/MetaRepoForPharo20> > > hmmm… didn’t remember that existed :) > but i was even considering propose you to deprecate the unsorted repository > (a lot of obsolete projects there)… > > Esteban > >> >> Stephan > >
