In order of preference: 1. UnifiedFFI 2. FFI-Unified (suggests that there may be multiple FFI implementations) 3. UFFI (not clear to me that this is an FFI)
Cheers, Max > On 12 Jan 2016, at 16:55, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > People has pointed (and they are right) that the name of the new FFI > front-end is misleading. > So yesterday I was talking with Stef and we think UnifiedFFI (or UFFI, for > short) is a better name… and to keep packages prox. to regular FFI I was > thinking on rename FFI-NB packages to FFI-Unified… but maybe is better just > to rename them as UFFI or UnifiedFFI… > what do you think? > > Esteban > >
