UniFFIed ? On 12 January 2016 at 17:40, Max Leske <maxle...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In order of preference: > > 1. UnifiedFFI > 2. FFI-Unified (suggests that there may be multiple FFI implementations) > 3. UFFI (not clear to me that this is an FFI) > > Cheers, > Max > > > On 12 Jan 2016, at 16:55, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > People has pointed (and they are right) that the name of the new FFI > front-end is misleading. > > So yesterday I was talking with Stef and we think UnifiedFFI (or UFFI, > for short) is a better name… and to keep packages prox. to regular FFI I > was thinking on rename FFI-NB packages to FFI-Unified… but maybe is better > just to rename them as UFFI or UnifiedFFI… > > what do you think? > > > > Esteban > > > > > > > -- Damien Pollet type less, do more [ | ] http://people.untyped.org/damien.pollet
