Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > People has pointed (and they are right) that the name of the new FFI > front-end is misleading.
"People" means more than just a single person (me). Glad that I'm not the only one who lamented ;) > So yesterday I was talking with Stef and we think UnifiedFFI (or UFFI, for > short) is a >better name… and to keep packages prox. to regular FFI I was thinking on >rename FFI-NB >packages to FFI-Unified… but maybe is better just to rename them as UFFI or >UnifiedFFI… > what do you think? +1 Given that we already have abbreviations in "NB" and "FFI" it's not a problem to go for "UFFI". But "UnifiedFFI" would be fine as well. Damien Pollet >UniFFIed ? Would be funny, but given that some people already have a problem with "SmallTalk" vs. "Smalltalk" I would not use it. Thanks T. << THE HARDEST PART IN PROGRAMMING IS FINDING PROPER NAMES >>
