Nicolai Hess-3-2 wrote > 2016-06-17 18:25 GMT+02:00 Tudor Girba <
> tudor@ > >: > >> So, we would need a logical modifier that would mean: >> - Mac: Alt >> - Win: Ctrl >> - Linux: Ctrl >> > > I though this is what Guillermo already did, but with "command" > > - Mac: Command > - Win/Linux: Ctrl > > Why did we choose Command and not Alt in the first place, why is Alt now > better? Not better, just different. In the general case, shortcuts with ctrl use cmd on Mac (like ctrl-c, ctrl-v, etc), but some navigation shortcuts (like previous / next word) use alt on osx where windows use ctrl. So having both meta and alt-meta bindings as I described, lets you represent both, but, due to the nature of alt, some care/restrictions would need to be applied to alt-meta that are not necessary for meta. -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/GT-Spotter-dive-in-shortcut-tp4899612p4901704.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
