On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:07 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> wrote: > yes, and I always said this is plain bad. > how it is now it is not a contextual menu,
I'm not clear how you mean this "how it is now", so I /think/ I'm agreeing when I say the World Menu is a context menu - the menu in the context of the World - which is why it should be on the right-mouse-button - the same as all our other context menus and those of the rest of the world. > is NextStep style and is the > correct behaviour (after we can discuss if we want to keep a menu as it is > now or not, but that’s another discussion) :) > > Esteban > > On 21 Jun 2016, at 15:54, Aliaksei Syrel <[email protected]> wrote: > >> In Pharo the World menu is accessed through left-click and right-click >> provides the world contents. In Bloc, right-click displays the world menu >> and left-click does nothing. Is it expected / some design choice or just >> convenience for debugging ? At first glance I thought Bloc didn't work >> because I was left-clicking like in Pharo. > > > It was like that from the very begging of Bloc development. Main developers > of Bloc prefer right click to open menu (like almost everywhere except > Pharo). > > Cheers, > Alex > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Aliaksei Syrel <[email protected]> > wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Aliaksei Syrel <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> When (in Bloc) I go to World menu>>help>>Help browser>>Bloc>>Grid >>>>> Layout, I find the following license: >>>> >>>> >> Copyright (C) 2011 The Android Open Source Project >>>> >> >>>> >> Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); >>>> >> you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. >>>> >> You may obtain a copy of the License at >>>> >> >>>> >>>> Apache 2.0 is compatible/can be used with MIT - as far as I can tell >>>> according to answers on Internet. Maybe a lawyer can answer more correctly. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Alex These charts provide a nice overview... [1] http://i.stack.imgur.com/CZIoa.png [2] http://www.dwheeler.com/essays/floss-license-slide.html [3] http://choosealicense.com/licenses/ Comparing MIT and Apache, the latter... * protects against patents * protects against trademark misuse * disclaims warranty and liability * requires changes to be clearly identified (in source) * default license assignment to contributions I believe [1] is in error tagging Apache as "any change must be distributed in source form." It is only IF you distribute in source form that you need to retain all copyright, patent, trademark and attribution notices. cheers -ben >>>> >> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 >>>> >> >>>> >> Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software >>>> >> distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, >>>> >> WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or >>>> >> implied. >>>> >> See the License for the specific language governing permissions and >>>> >> limitations under the License. >>>> >> >>>> >> Does it mean Bloc is not under MIT ? Or is it completely unrelated ?
