Tudor Girba-2 wrote > Here is a brief update on the status of Bloc. Thanks!
Tudor Girba-2 wrote > your feedback is important As we've imagined and experimented with the UI of our future, I've felt very strongly that it's essential for the world to be built up from building blocks which make few assumptions other than their communication protocol and can be easily plugged in and out by a courageous user. A test case for this, which opens up many exciting possibilities (imagine I want to control time in my space e.g. run a simulation at 10x speed...), would be to have a world within a world. I dabbled with this idea a bit in Morphic, but quickly became frustrated because Morphic makes too many assumptions e.g. relying on globals and hardcoded classes. The last time I tried this in Bloc, the result of the discussion was that Alain said that this should be conceptually possible, but that I should be patient (http://forum.world.st/Bloc-Space-within-a-Space-td4877474.html). Are we any closer to this dream? ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/bloc-status-update-june-2016-tp4901988p4902319.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
