I will probably sound stupid but here I go.

I am no fan of Pragmas. I feel that their syntax is weird and unnecessary
and what they do can be easily achieved with a secondary class that
provides this meta data.

In case of examples it would have been possible to have examples in a
separate package together with a class that provides the additional info
the IDE needs to trigger the right tools.

On the other hand I was neither a fan of using example as part of a method
name.

Saying that instancePrototype sounds a lot more clear than examplar.

On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 at 08:39, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi sean
>
> this is exactly with <sampleInstance> but this is not exactly the
> solution doru envision.
>
> But I think that sampleInstance is letting people build extra tools and
> also let people use the sample method
>
> in their test and others.
>
>
> Stef
>
>
> Le 21/8/16 à 02:01, Sean P. DeNigris a écrit :
> > Tudor Girba-2 wrote
> >> In this case, you will not be able to use the resulting object, and the
> >> new energy around examples started from the need to utilize that ability
> >> The other solution is to delegate the action to another pragma that can
> >> complement the example one.
> > Isn't that what we've settled on? That is, <sampleInstance> for when you
> > need the result? It seems that all bases are covered if those methods
> return
> > an instance and the browser button takes that instance and opens an
> > inspector, no?
> >
> >
> >
> > -----
> > Cheers,
> > Sean
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://forum.world.st/example-examplar-tp4911728p4912083.html
> > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
> >
> >
>
>
>

Reply via email to