Yes, that would be great.

I just wander if the increased complexity pays off... normally if I am
running my tests I do not have lots of tasks in mind, I will decide what to
do next after seeing that my tests are green. Maybe I just want to browse
some code, I do not need super fancy features.



On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Guille Polito <guillermopol...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> > On 16 Sep 2016, at 12:43, Nicolas Passerini <npasser...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I think it would be nice to be able to run tests in background.
>> >
>>
>> The easiest is to start multiple images… this way they can destroy
>> whatever without impacting you.
>> I think Guille has something in preparation…
>>
>> The nice aspect of this is that it runs really in parallel.
>>
>
>  That is a nice feature, but if I am working on something and I make
> changes I would like to run the tests right where I am working.
>
> That is a cosmethic thing.
>
> Imagine you could run the tests on a copy of the image you were
> developing. If there is an error, your development image gets notified, and
> so you can then debug the error on your local environment.
>
>

Reply via email to