Yes, that would be great. I just wander if the increased complexity pays off... normally if I am running my tests I do not have lots of tasks in mind, I will decide what to do next after seeing that my tests are green. Maybe I just want to browse some code, I do not need super fancy features.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Guille Polito <[email protected]> wrote: > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> > On 16 Sep 2016, at 12:43, Nicolas Passerini <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > I think it would be nice to be able to run tests in background. >> > >> >> The easiest is to start multiple images… this way they can destroy >> whatever without impacting you. >> I think Guille has something in preparation… >> >> The nice aspect of this is that it runs really in parallel. >> > > That is a nice feature, but if I am working on something and I make > changes I would like to run the tests right where I am working. > > That is a cosmethic thing. > > Imagine you could run the tests on a copy of the image you were > developing. If there is an error, your development image gets notified, and > so you can then debug the error on your local environment. > >
