For code reviews, Phabricator and Arcanist are nice. This is like Facebook for code. Facebook uses this thing internally. As for FB, there are "apps".
[image: Inline image 3] Differential is the part of Phabricator for doing the reviews. The key idea is that you cannot commit to the repo directly. You use "arc diff" to create a "revision" that you post to the system. You get a number for this. Not a long git commit id, but a real number (e.g. 610). Code review ensues, where people can put comments etc through a web interface. Comments can be at any level: file, line of code (click and add comment on the line). We were doing Zend Framework 2 and so PSR-2 standards applied. There was a check happening before even being able to submit, so be compliant or do not pass. A pain, but ultimately catched a few bugs that could have been nasty. Once the review is successful, a user with the proper permissions will do an "arc land" Once arc land was done, the differential landed on the github repo, and the CI could pick it up for official packaging. All in all, it is a nice workflow when lots of people are working at once on a code base. Also allows to limit the amount of crap ending up in the official repo due to devs not having a clue (happened). I used the toolset for a project where the developers where remote and it worked well (team size: Belgium 3 people, Romania 10+). Code was in Github private repo. https://secure.phabricator.com/ One can look around. HTH Phil On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Dale Henrichs < [email protected]> wrote: > Guillermo, > > Apparently you don't like the github browser-based code review tool? > > What are your objections? > > Do you know of a better tool that is out in the wild or do you just have > visions that code review could be better? > > Better tools are always possible, but it is sometimes nice to use a tool > that you didn't have to build from scratch while creating the better tool:) > > Dale > On 10/27/2016 05:06 AM, Guillermo Polito wrote: > > I would like to have a good code review tool, before having to do one > ad-hoc... > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Denis Kudriashov <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> With future transition to github I ask myself what tools we will have out >> of the box. >> I google a bit and found these nice service http://ghv.artzub.com. >> Try to search guillep and then pharo-core. It looks really nice. >> >> What other online services you know to analyse github projects? >> > > >
