2016-10-28 11:07 GMT+02:00 Guille Polito <[email protected]>:
> Hi! > > -------- Original Message -------- > > Guillermo, > > Apparently you don't like the github browser-based code review tool? > > What are your objections? > > Do you know of a better tool that is out in the wild or do you just have > visions that code review could be better? > > Better tools are always possible, but it is sometimes nice to use a tool > that you didn't have to build from scratch while creating the better tool:) > > Well, that is in fact my point. I'd like to know options and alternatives. > If the easiest to setup and use is github's one, ok, that's no problem to > me. > > What bothers me the most from the github+filetree combination when > reviewing a pull request, is that it is a file-based review. And finally > you're reviewing the low-level export format, and I get a bit lost... Just > dreaming, maybe there is some tool out there where we can just provide a > kind of plugin to enhance the review? > Maybe a local copy of the pull request (it is just a branch in git terms, after all) and using Iceberg ? Thierry > > But for sure I do not want to do one from scratch :) > > Dale > On 10/27/2016 05:06 AM, Guillermo Polito wrote: > > I would like to have a good code review tool, before having to do one > ad-hoc... > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Denis Kudriashov <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> With future transition to github I ask myself what tools we will have out >> of the box. >> I google a bit and found these nice service http://ghv.artzub.com. >> Try to search guillep and then pharo-core. It looks really nice. >> >> What other online services you know to analyse github projects? >> > > > >
