On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 11:09:51AM +0200, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
>
> > On 5 Aug 2017, at 11:06, Alistair Grant <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 10:49:02AM +0200, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
> >> I think there is a consensus we need to keep #cr and #lf as intended,
> >> yet to add some kind of #newLine (which btw is different to EOL :P)
> >> vocabulary, isn???t?
> >>
> >> In this, I favour Peter approach for define line ending convention
> >> (the way #newLine will work)??? and of course by default it should use
> >> the one from the current platform.
> >>
> >> anything agains this approach?
> >>
> >> Esteban
> >
> > +1
> >
> > I prefer #nl to #newLine, but admit that it is a subjective preference
> > and that descriptive names are generally better.
>
> heh, me too... but is a bit cryptic.
#nl
"Insert the platform dependent end of line character.
For people that haven't got used to terminal communications rising
above 9600baud"
^self newLine
:-)
