On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 07:29:02PM +0200, Guillermo Polito wrote:
> Hi Stef,
> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.s...@gmail.com>
> Hi Alistair
> I'm going over the green build first.
> - Can you tell me what you think about the PR 92 05723 Default Working
> This cannot be integrated yet. We have to review dependencies in the
> because it introduces a (correct) definition of a working directory but using
> FFI. And FFI is not in the kernel.
I'm looking forward to this PR, as with most people, I think this will
make scripting with Pharo much easier (I've also used the workaround of
forking a shell to get the output of pwd :-().
Rajula went out of his way to discuss the implications of this on the
mailing list, see:
For full transparency, I haven't tested the code, but might try and load
it over the next week or so.
Obviously the issue Guillermo raises needs to be addressed before it can be