2017-10-04 16:49 GMT-03:00 Denis Kudriashov <dionisi...@gmail.com>: > 2017-10-04 21:38 GMT+02:00 Esteban A. Maringolo <emaring...@gmail.com>:
>>> It is not compiled time but behaviour is very close to it. >>> The trick is that first time execution will replace full expression with >>> the result as literal (the receiver of #asMethodConst). So at second time it >>> will be just literal reading. >> It is weird that a regular message send makes the returned value a method >> constant. >> How is that cleaned up? Do I have to search for all the methods that >> contain such message send? > What the problem? This message is a tool. You use it when you need it. When > you modify the method the value is cleaned. > Nice thing is that it not requires special syntax. And you can debug > expression as normal part of method. I don't see any problem, I just said "weird". It's a "special return" message send. A trick of sorts, no different than #doesNotUnderstand: or other special selectors. Regards, Esteban A. Maringolo
