Hi Cyril,
> On Feb 8, 2018, at 2:49 AM, Cyril Ferlicot <cyril.ferli...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 5:58 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> (it was broken since december) >> >> Which means latest vm versions are latest builds from OSVM: >> >> 64bit >> >> • http://files.pharo.org/get-files/70/pharo64-mac-latest.zip >> • >> http://files.pharo.org/get-files/70/pharo64-linux-threaded-latest.zip >> • http://files.pharo.org/get-files/70/pharo64-linux-latest.zip >> • http://files.pharo.org/get-files/70/pharo64-win-latest.zip >> 32bit >> >> • http://files.pharo.org/get-files/70/pharo-linux-threaded-latest.zip >> • http://files.pharo.org/get-files/70/pharo-linux-latest.zip >> • http://files.pharo.org/get-files/70/pharo-mac-latest.zip >> • http://files.pharo.org/get-files/70/pharo-win-latest.zip >> >> Hints >> >> • MacOS VMs now are signed! This should fix a lot of problems we had >> before. >> • Please take note that win64 build lacks all library dependencies, >> and many things will not work (working on that). >> Thanks to Fabio to help me put all the pieces together. >> >> > ) > cheers, >> Esteban > > Hi! > > Just a little feedback. > > Currently, at Synectique, we added Pharo 61 64bits build to our > Jenkins. Those builds failed **a lot** because of segmentation faults. > We added a mechanism to retry two times when there was a segfault and > even like that we have failing builds. > > Since the restoration of the vms I removed the retry mechanism and I > added a hack to use the latest Pharo 70 vm > (http://files.pharo.org/get-files/70/pharo64-linux-latest.zip) instead > of the stable pharo 61 vm. Since then, there was no crash due to the > VM. > This is a great improvement. > Then I have a question: Is it plan to release new stable 64bit vms for > Pharo 61? Currently, our builds are based on hacks and if no problem > is detected with the latest vm it would greatly help stability-wise to > have official vms that does not crash 3/5times when we load a project. > Also, I understand it can be hard to backport vms with the resources > of the community. :) Why do you need to back port? Why can't you use the 7.x VM with 6.x images? The VM is intended to be backwards compatible. > > -- > Cyril Ferlicot > https://ferlicot.fr >
