Esteban A. Maringolo wrote >> That means with a code rewrite rule. Deprecations are not enough. > Why not both?
It seems like you're both saying the same thing, no? Isn't this all accomplished via: self deprecated: 'Renamed to #action because now accepts any valuable as an action (e.g. aBlock).' on: '10/24/2017' in: #Pharo61 transformWith: '`@receiver selector' -> '`@receiver action'. Or are you saying there should be a collection of rewrite rules even after the method is totally removed so one can bring a very old project up to the newest APIs? ----- Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html