That could be nice!! Maybe having a prototype allows us to see more usages!
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 9:58 AM, Peter Uhnák <[email protected]> wrote: > Would it be possible to instead have a #haltIf object to which you can > send additional conditions? > > E.g. > > self haltIf insideTest > self haltIf outsideTest > > Makes it (imho) a bit more readable, adds just a single method to Object, > and allows for more potential extensions... > > self haltIf nil. > self haltIf count: 3. > > etc? > > Peter > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 8:36 AM, Christophe Demarey < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > Le 4 avr. 2018 à 04:34, Sean P. DeNigris <[email protected]> a >> écrit : >> > >> > demarey wrote >> >> What about haltIfTestExecutionEnvironment and >> >> haltIfDefaultExecutionEnvironment ? >> > >> > I thought the names were okay. What did you think was unclear about >> them? >> >> At a first look #haltInsideTest and #haltOutsideTest do not tell me that >> they are conditional breakpoints. >> maybe just add a if would solve that: #haltIfInsideTest #haltIfOutsideTest >> > > -- Pablo Tesone. [email protected]
