> On 4 Apr 2018, at 09:58, Peter Uhnák <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Would it be possible to instead have a #haltIf object to which you can send
> additional conditions?
>
> E.g.
>
> self haltIf insideTest
> self haltIf outsideTest
>
> Makes it (imho) a bit more readable, adds just a single method to Object, and
> allows for more potential extensions...
>
> self haltIf nil.
> self haltIf count: 3.
>
Interesting. I will make a not.
Another thing to think about is that all this “combination” stuff might be
where a BreakPoint system with a good UI actually starts to be
better than a textual halt.
The power of the Smalltalk #halt lies to some extend it its radical simplicity.
Marcus
