On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 1:13 PM Cyril Ferlicot D. <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 13/06/2018 12:57, Tim Mackinnon wrote: > > Hi I’m a bit confused by what is described below - when it says "This is > > already in latest Pharo build. If you want to try it in a Pharo 6.1 ….” > > - does that mean its already in the latest Pharo 7 (emphasis on 7?) > > build (and I can see it in Pharo 7) - but the latest 6.1 build doesn’t > > have it and you must follow the steps you described? > > > > Hi! > > Each time an Iceberg stable version is released, it is integrated to > Pharo 7. (Usually, it's available the next day the time to do the PR, > test it, integrate it and build the new version) > > Pharo 6.1 is still at the v0.6 of Iceberg. IIUC, thi is mostly because > the new UI depends on a lot of changes from Pharo 7 and backporting it > would mean backport too many changes. The goal is to keep Pharo 6.1 as > stable as possible. > Actually, the main reason is that Metacello integration has some different semantics that would bother people relying on the current behaviour. Ideally, we would like to have a Pharo6.2, but that means a lot of work infrastructure-wise (build servers, file server, zeroconf...). > So the steps to update yourself Iceberg to v1.? is for Pharo 6 only. > > > I initially read it to mean that new Pharo 6.1 builds would > > automatically get it - but that doesn’t seem to be the case? > > > > Tim > > > > > -- > Cyril Ferlicot > https://ferlicot.fr > > -- Guille Polito Research Engineer Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille CRIStAL - UMR 9189 French National Center for Scientific Research - *http://www.cnrs.fr <http://www.cnrs.fr>* *Web:* *http://guillep.github.io* <http://guillep.github.io> *Phone: *+33 06 52 70 66 13
