the convention <category>Tests[<-subcategory>] seems great IMO.e.g. Graphics-Text -> GraphicsTests-Text
With this naming pattern it is possible to have 2 monticello packages : <category> and <category>Tests And it is possible to not load Tests packages in a deployed image. Luc 2008/9/11 Alexandre Bergel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Having a package name without any - will prevent Monticello from being > confuse on some point. > Stef and I already experienced that... > > I was never happy in inserting a - in a package name. > > Alexandre > > > > On 11 Sep 2008, at 07:23, Damien Cassou wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Stéphane Ducasse >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> I noticed that we have CollectionsTests-Ordered >>> kind of package name and I would prefer to get Collections-Ordered-Tests >>> What do you think. I bit of regularity would help. >>> >> >> Collections-Test-* categories belong to the Collections-Test package >> on monticello. If you rename it to Collections-Ordered-Tests, you will >> put everything in the Collections package (because there is no >> Collections-Ordered monticello package). >> >> >> -- >> Damien Cassou >> Peter von der Ahé: «I'm beginning to see why Gilad wished us good >> luck». (http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/entry/override_snafu) >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > -- > _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: > Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu > ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
