On Sep 11, 2008, at 9:35 AM, Luc Fabresse wrote:

the convention <category>Tests[<-subcategory>] seems great IMO.
e.g. Graphics-Text -> GraphicsTests-Text

With this naming pattern it is possible to have 2 monticello packages : <category> and <category>Tests
And it is possible to not load Tests packages in a deployed image.

Yes it does not work if Graphics is composed of several subpackages

With this I cannot have

Collections-OrderedCollection
and
Collections-OrderedCollection-Tests

separated from

Collections-Set
and
Collections-Set-Tests

For me I want to have packages that I can load independently and the tests should be attached to the package (to be eventually not load with it).


I really hate the fact that we feel everywhere category and string matching.

Stef


Luc

2008/9/11 Alexandre Bergel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Having a package name without any - will prevent Monticello from being confuse on some point.
Stef and I already experienced that...

I was never happy in inserting a - in a package name.

Alexandre



On 11 Sep 2008, at 07:23, Damien Cassou wrote:

On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi

I noticed that we have CollectionsTests-Ordered
kind of package name and I would prefer to get Collections-Ordered- Tests
What do you think. I bit of regularity would help.

Collections-Test-* categories belong to the Collections-Test package
on monticello. If you rename it to Collections-Ordered-Tests, you will
put everything in the Collections package (because there is no
Collections-Ordered monticello package).


--
Damien Cassou
Peter von der Ahé: «I'm beginning to see why Gilad wished us good
luck». (http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/entry/override_snafu)
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.







_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project


_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to