I understand the problem and I did not explain well but the solution of the Graphics package seems great : Graphics-Text Graphics-Files
and GraphicsTests-Text GraphicsTests-Files Other packages like Graphics : CollectionTests-*, KernelTests-*, ... Packages with other naming conventions that do not seem great : File-Tests, Tests-*, Monticello-Tests Sure, a system that does not rely on string maching would be better. #Luc 2008/9/11 Stéphane Ducasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Sep 11, 2008, at 9:35 AM, Luc Fabresse wrote: > > the convention <category>Tests[<-subcategory>] seems great IMO. >> e.g. Graphics-Text -> GraphicsTests-Text >> >> With this naming pattern it is possible to have 2 monticello packages : >> <category> and <category>Tests >> And it is possible to not load Tests packages in a deployed image. >> > > Yes it does not work if Graphics is composed of several subpackages > > With this I cannot have > > Collections-OrderedCollection > and > Collections-OrderedCollection-Tests > > separated from > > Collections-Set > and > Collections-Set-Tests > > For me I want to have packages that I can load independently and the tests > should be attached to the package (to be eventually not load with it). > >> >> > I really hate the fact that we feel everywhere category and string > matching. > > Stef > > > >> Luc >> >> 2008/9/11 Alexandre Bergel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Having a package name without any - will prevent Monticello from being >> confuse on some point. >> Stef and I already experienced that... >> >> I was never happy in inserting a - in a package name. >> >> Alexandre >> >> >> >> On 11 Sep 2008, at 07:23, Damien Cassou wrote: >> >> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Stéphane Ducasse >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi >> >> I noticed that we have CollectionsTests-Ordered >> kind of package name and I would prefer to get Collections-Ordered-Tests >> What do you think. I bit of regularity would help. >> >> Collections-Test-* categories belong to the Collections-Test package >> on monticello. If you rename it to Collections-Ordered-Tests, you will >> put everything in the Collections package (because there is no >> Collections-Ordered monticello package). >> >> >> -- >> Damien Cassou >> Peter von der Ahé: «I'm beginning to see why Gilad wished us good >> luck». (http://blogs.sun.com/ahe/entry/override_snafu) >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> -- >> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: >> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu >> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
