oscar it would be nice to see if the implementation make also sense in presence of other collection. I do not have the time to check but if a group of people can check and report this will help us to take a decision. I would like to have split and join in general because this is a cool abstraction. Stef
On Apr 5, 2009, at 9:51 AM, Oscar Nierstrasz wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > What's the status of split and join? > > http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=4874 > > I need them for a project and since they are not there yet, I have > gone back to RubyShards. > > http://squeaksource.com/RubyShards/ > > Keith, do you think this can be integrated into Pharo already, or does > it need some work still? > > (I think our implementation is not particularly efficient, but it > should be serviceable.) > > Cheers, > - on > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project > _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
