OK. split: assumes regexes with cannot work for collections, but this can be generalized, as you suggest.
Will try to have a look at this. - on On Apr 5, 2009, at 10:26, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: > oscar > > it would be nice to see if the implementation make also sense in > presence of other collection. > I do not have the time to check but if a group of people can check and > report this will > help us to take a decision. > I would like to have split and join in general because this is a cool > abstraction. > Stef > > On Apr 5, 2009, at 9:51 AM, Oscar Nierstrasz wrote: > >> >> Hi Folks, >> >> What's the status of split and join? >> >> http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=4874 >> >> I need them for a project and since they are not there yet, I have >> gone back to RubyShards. >> >> http://squeaksource.com/RubyShards/ >> >> Keith, do you think this can be integrated into Pharo already, or >> does >> it need some work still? >> >> (I think our implementation is not particularly efficient, but it >> should be serviceable.) >> >> Cheers, >> - on >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pharo-project mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Pharo-project mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
