On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K <[email protected]>wrote:

> Stef,
>
> No browser should be that slow.  I suspect the Linux vm is not a speed
> demon, the xp machines I use are heavily burdened by anit-virus software


Nod32 in Windows WON'T let you use squeak or Pharo. You have to exclude from
Nod32 the folder where you have the .changes.


> and other performance drains, etc.  My linux box at home might be further
> hindered by the fact that I bought a wide screen monitor for it, and use
> LOTS of screen real estate.  Still, when I compare Pharo with other software
> (including Dolphin) under similarly abusive conditions, Pharo is not quick.
>
> This particular image is small; it is based on the most recent web image,
> and is 22 MB.  It has some of my Seaside code in it, but has not yet
> executed same.  I have a couple of Seaside cleanup expressions that help
> when images bloat up, but looking at the current size makes me think I'm
> missing an opportunity.  All that aside, on my linux box, I find that after
> the saving cursor disappears, it can take a few seconds for the image to
> again become responsive.  On xp in my office, there is at least a second of
> down time after the cursor reverts to normal.
>
> In doing some SIF imports, I noted that it was hard to tell when the image
> was still busy.  I have no idea how long it should take to do the work it
> was doing, but it took long enough that some gentle prodding becomes
> irresistable: "is it done yet?"  I remember lots of debate about Cursor
> class>>showWhile: on Dolphin; it might be one of those things that is tricky
> to get right.
>
> A little bit nicer news: I have it running on my office machine (xp), with
> FreeType in use, and it's ok with the standard tools and the w2k theme.
>
>
>

> Bill
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Stéphane Ducasse
> Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 2:31 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Making some progress, and a few observations
>
> >
> > Stef,
> >
> > In terms of response times, even with a lot of things turned off, I
> > was still surprised at how long it takes to change from even one
> > method to another.
>
> which browser are you using.
> Because the old browser should not be that slow.
>
>
> > Anything past 0.2 sec (or whatever that threshold is) starts to add
> > up; Pharo sometimes takes up to a second, which is _really_ shows up.
> >
> > Saving an image is not necessarily quick either, I _think_ particuarly
> > on Linux??
>
> What is the size of your image: here jannik generated an image of 800 mb.
>
> >  Also, I get the sense the wait cursors are displayed, on Linux, for a
> > smaller fraction of the down time than on Windows.
> >
> > Bill
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected]
> > [mailto:[email protected]
> > ] On Behalf Of Stéphane Ducasse
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 12:58 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Making some progress, and a few
> > observations
> >
> >
> > On Jul 15, 2009, at 6:04 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:
> >
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >> I managed to create an install script; as I suspected would be case,
> >> it was very anticlimactic.  I tried creating a password-protected
> >> directory under my personal web site, but that did not go well.  The
> >> authentication is weird, so it was probably asking a lot.  A
> >> directory repository worked.
> >
> > Good to know
> >> Does Monticello/PackageInfo see a change in method category (aka
> >> package) as a change to the package?
> >
> > normally it should.
> >
> >> It appears not, and it worries me a little in that it seems to make
> >> it easy to lose work by forgetting to save it.  Do any of you script
> >> saving your packages?
> >
> > you can check in ScriptLoader to see how we compute the packages that
> > changed (not only dirty but also new packages)
> >
> >> The results are untested at present, but I used SIF to transfer a
> >> fair amount of code into Pharo.  To cope with the naming of the ODBC
> >> classes, I ended up doing things like Smalltalk at:#DBConnection
> >> put:ODBCConnection, and that worked out nicely, at least AFAICT at
> >> this stage.  SIF finally ended up complaining about running out of
> >> items when processing the last file.  I reserve the right to later
> >> report that it was a miserable failure, but it looks like I most of
> >> the code imported.
> >>
> >> Using the standard tools, the w2k theme, disabling faded backgrounds
> >> and enabling fast drag, performance on an older Linux system is ok
> >> (more or less).  There are still things that take too long,
> >
> > like what?
> >
> >> and Pharo's responses are no better (sometimes worse) than even
> >> software running over a remote desktop connection.  We need a speed
> >> boost, but judicious settings help a little.
> >>
> >> Is there a way to disable the anti-aliased fonts?  In fairness, I
> >> should try turning that off to see if any speed boost is worth the
> >> price.
> >>
> >> Bill
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Pharo-project mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pharo-project mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pharo-project mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project

Reply via email to